Otto v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because DWI requires no culpable mental state \defense of involuntary intoxication is not relevant\
• because DWI requires no culpable mental state “defense of involuntary intoxication is not relevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Farmer, Kody William
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-10-09· cited 86×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2009-09-16· cited 27×
• Otto v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-06· cited 15×
• Otto v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-09-28· cited 12×
• Scott C. Brown v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-02-12
• Otto, Adriane Elaine
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-09-28
• Otto, Adriane Elaine
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-06
• Harold James Harris v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-11-25

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Almanza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
• Robbins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-07-02· cited 232×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-10· cited 193×
• Ex Parte Ross
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-04-16· cited 134×
• Torres v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-07-11· cited 83×
• Marvis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-01-31· cited 64×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-17· cited 50×
• Sutton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-07· cited 44×
• Aliff v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1997-10-23· cited 36×
• Medina v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1998-04-08· cited 25×