District of Columbia· 5/24/2005
Brown v. Barnhart
Citations
- 370 F. Supp. 2d 286
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9884
- 2005 WL 1231911
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing and remanding because the ALJ did not apply the revised regulation to the applicant’s claim
- reversing on grounds of ALJ’s failure to apply updated listings, which “deprived Mr. Brown of the opportunity to prove that his condition ‘meets or equals a listed impairment’” at step three
- noting that while the court can “affirm, modify, or reverse the decision of the agency, “with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing[,] ... it is the role of the ALJ, not the courts, to make findings of fact and to resolve conflicts in the evidence” ”
- noting that while the court can “affirm, modify, or reverse the decision of the agency, “with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing[,] . . . it is the role of the ALJ, not the courts, to make findings of fact and to resolve conflicts in the evidence”
- finding a claim “pending” until the ALJ “issued [a] final decision”
- remanding where ALJ failed to apply revised version of Listings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cunningham v. ColvinDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-30· cited 32×
- Brown v. BarnhartDistrict of Columbia· 2006-01-12· cited 26×
- Nicholson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-28· cited 19×
- Broyles v. BarnhartDistrict of Columbia· 2012-12-18· cited 18×
- Angela Cox v. Kilolo KijakaziD.C. Circuit· 2023-07-28· cited 14×
- Carnett v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2015-02-24· cited 12×
- Holland v. BerryhillDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-29· cited 11×
- Dunham v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-24· cited 7×
- Simpson v. ColvinDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-10· cited 3×
- Williams v. BerryhillDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-31· cited 1×
- Bennett v. BerryhillDistrict of Columbia· 2019-10-27
- Henderson v. BerryhillDistrict of Columbia· 2019-10-28
- Kyler v. SaulDistrict of Columbia· 2022-04-20
- White v. BerryhillDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-15
- De Deaux v. SaulDistrict of Columbia· 2022-10-25
- Coleman v. SaulDistrict of Columbia· 2023-02-27
- Zguro v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2023-05-11
- Odom v. SaulDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-21
- Davids v. Andrew Saul Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2023-10-06
- Hinton v. SaulDistrict of Columbia· 2023-10-31
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 3,376×
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareSecond Circuit· 1979-12-11· cited 1,106×
- Coffman v. BowenFourth Circuit· 1987-09-23· cited 426×
- Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1986-06-20· cited 143×
- Lorraine Smith v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health & Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 111×
- Davis v. HecklerDistrict of Columbia· 1983-06-24· cited 67×
- Schoofield v. BarnhartD. Maryland· 2002-09-06· cited 66×
- Martin v. ApfelDistrict of Columbia· 2000-08-30· cited 60×
- Jackson v. BarnhartDistrict of Columbia· 2002-04-02· cited 25×
- Edward G. Stankiewicz v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services'D.C. Circuit· 1990-04-10· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.