Melkonyan v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court may not use inherent power to remand in a disability benefits case
• holding that a court may remand the case after passing on its merits and issuing a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision
• holding that a district court may not use inherent power to remand in a disability benefits case
• recognizing that Congress created two methods of remand under § 405(g), a sentence four and a sentence six remand
• holding that a sentence four remand is a final judgment that terminates the civil action
• holding that under the EAJA a judgment is no longer appealable once the time for filing an appeal has lapsed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).