Martin v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ “cannot merely disregard evidence which does not support his conclusion”
• holding that the ALJ “cannot merely disregard evidence which does not support his conclusion”
• finding that an ALJ is required to consider the cumulative effects of all claimant’s ailments and, if relevant, medications
• “A reviewing court should not be left guessing as to how the ALJ evaluated probative evidence.”
• “[W]here the record in the case has been thoroughly developed, and a hearing would merely function to delay the award of benefits, reversal [instead of remand] is appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).