Branson v. Harrah's Tunica Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing Title VII and ADEA claims using same “cat’s paw” theory of liability
• “As [the plaintiff’s] response brief failed to even address [the defendant’s] argument regarding retaliation, the court concludes that [the plaintiff] has waived and abandoned this claim.”
• “If a party fails to properly oppose an argument raised in a motion for summary judgment, the claim is deemed waived and the non- moving party will lose the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).