Carol A. Jacklyn Roger Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court may not consider for the Traverse City position demonstrates that all candidates hearsay on a motion for summary judgment
• holding that “neither requiring plaintiff to work at home while she was recovering from out-patient surgery, nor rejecting computer expenses that previously had been approved, were materially adverse employment actions”
• holding that “neither requiring plaintiff to work at home while she was recovering from out-patient surgery, nor rejecting computer expenses that previously had been approved, were materially adverse employment actions”
• stating that, for a lay witness’s opinion testimony to be admissible, the opinion must be rationally based on the witness’s first-hand knowledge
• noting that because the third-party declarant denied making the alleged hearsay statements “hearsay is an issue”
• noting that hearsay evidence may not be considered on summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).