Skip to main content
· 8/25/2006

Rhoda Grizzell v. City of Columbus Division of Police

Citations

  • 461 F.3d 711
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21662
  • 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,542
  • 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1499
  • 2006 WL 2454676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “mere personal belief, conjecture and speculation” are insufficient to support an inference for purposes of summary judgment
  • “It is well settled that [m]ere personal beliefs, conjecture and speculation are insufficient to support an inference of [ ] discrimination.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • statements of a deputy police chief regarding promotion eligibility were admissible nonhearsay because deputy chief was “charged with managing the promotional process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, Gibbons, Edmunds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.