Skip to main content
· 1/27/1994

Betty ROUSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 10 F.3d 392
  • 1993 WL 494509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that reinstatement is the “presumptively favored equitable remedy” and should be granted “in the ordinary case”
  • noting that Ms. Roush obtained similar employment after her discharge, albeit a job without any benefits
  • the need to instruct the jury on what factors to consider in determining the amount of front pay is “the most obvious reason why” the court must state the reasons for why such an award is or is not appropriate before submitting the damages issue to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, Batchelder, Miles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.