· 1/27/1994
Betty ROUSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 10 F.3d 392
- 1993 WL 494509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that reinstatement is the “presumptively favored equitable remedy” and should be granted “in the ordinary case”
- noting that Ms. Roush obtained similar employment after her discharge, albeit a job without any benefits
- the need to instruct the jury on what factors to consider in determining the amount of front pay is “the most obvious reason why” the court must state the reasons for why such an award is or is not appropriate before submitting the damages issue to the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guy, Batchelder, Miles
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.