Chrissie Washington v. Illinois Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assignment to new shift that did not allow for a flex-time schedule was a materially adverse employment action for plaintiff who eared-for a disabled son
• noting that a change of supervisors is not ordinarily sufficiently materially adverse to constitute an adverse employment action in a retaliation claim
• holding rescission of flex-time schedule for mother with disabled child was a “materially adverse change” for purpose of retaliation claim
• stating that a tangible employment action must be “significant” in order to qualify as discrimination so that “life’s little reverses are not causes of litigation”
• stating that a tangible employment action must be “significant” in order to qualify as discrimination so that “life’s little reverses are not causes of litigation”
• finding that an employer’s intentional and targeted change to an employee’s working hours could be an adverse employment action under narrow circumstances in the retaliation context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).