Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 9/26/2003

Boyd v. State

Citations

913 So. 2d 1113
2003 WL 22220330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a claim that failed to “disclose the manner in which any such expert would have countered the State’s expert testimony was inefficiently pleaded
noting that \`Rule 32.6(b) requires that the petition itself disclose the facts relied upon in seeking relief'\
\Claims presented in a Rule 32 petition but not pursued on appeal are deemed to be abandoned.\
only when “facts are pleaded, which, if true, entitle a petitioner to relief, [is] the petitioner then entitled to an opportunity, as provided in Rule 32.9, Ala. R. Crim. P., to present evidence proving those alleged facts.” (citing Ala. R. Crim. P. 32.6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.