Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 5/27/2005
Duncan v. State
Citations
- 925 So. 2d 245
- 2005 WL 628215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting trial court's findings that summary dismissal of petition was proper where the claims were refuted by the record on direct appeal
- adopting trial court's findings that summary dismissal of petition was proper where the claims were refuted by the record on direct appeal
- summary denial of claim that counsel was ineffective as a result of inadequate compensation was proper where petitioner failed to allege how counsel's performance would have been different had the statutory compensation scheme been different
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baschab
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Loggins v. ThomasEleventh Circuit· 2011-09-07· cited 101×
- Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-03-03· cited 87×
- McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-08-31· cited 65×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-11-02· cited 64×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-05-29· cited 45×
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-04-04· cited 43×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-02-17· cited 43×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-08-25· cited 38×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-04-27· cited 33×
- Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-08-29· cited 29×
- Shonelle Andre Jackson v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-11-13· cited 22×
- Acra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-09-28· cited 17×
- Benjamin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-12-20· cited 16×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-07-08· cited 15×
- Yeomans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-03-29· cited 14×
- Townes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-12-18· cited 13×
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-11-23· cited 11×
- Wimberly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-08-26· cited 10×
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-09-29· cited 10×
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-10-04· cited 7×
Cites
89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,714×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,706×
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,683×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.