District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/11/1988
Boyce v. Boyce
Citations
- 541 A.2d 614
- 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 84
- 1988 WL 57370
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \An inchoate tort is not assignable.\
- “An inchoate tort is not assignable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Rogers, Steadman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mistler v. MistlerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-08-29· cited 83×
- Liming v. LimingNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-11-03· cited 69×
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-12-29· cited 66×
- In Re the Marriage of FieldsColorado Court of Appeals· 1989-09-18· cited 33×
- McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-03-11· cited 26×
- Tramel v. TramelMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-08-12· cited 23×
- Dietz v. DietzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-16· cited 16×
- Wash. Tennis & Educ. Found., Inc. v. Clark Nexsen, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-08-20· cited 10×
- Collier v. CollierHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1990-05-14· cited 6×
- Inniss v. InnissSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-08-18· cited 6×
- Estate of Reap v. MalloyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-04-01· cited 5×
- Strankowski v. StrankowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 5×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29· cited 1×
- Wendell Wayne Tramel v. Lisa Renee Coleman TramelMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-11-06
- Washington Tennis & Education Foundation, Inc. v. Clark Nexsen, Inc.District of Columbia· 2018-08-20
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 507×
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 161×
- In Re Marriage of HuntAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-11-05· cited 144×
- Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-08· cited 126×
- Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-06-02· cited 83×
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-03-14· cited 81×
- In Re the Marriage of BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1984-01-12· cited 71×
- Unkle v. UnkleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-12· cited 71×
- Amato v. AmatoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-08-05· cited 64×
- Flynn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 60×
- Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-11-07· cited 59×
- Platek v. PlatekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 59×
- Jurek v. JurekArizona Supreme Court· 1980-01-30· cited 58×
- In Re the Marriage of JonesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-04-13· cited 56×
- In Re Marriage of GanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-20· cited 47×
- Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-02-19· cited 39×
- Nixon v. NixonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-07-08· cited 39×
- Heilman v. HeilmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1980-03-04· cited 39×
- Wheeler v. WheelerD.C. Circuit· 1951-02-15· cited 37×
- In Re Marriage of FairchildAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-11-08· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.