Skip to main content
· 11/3/2006

Liming v. Liming

Citations

  • 272 Neb. 534
  • 723 N.W.2d 89
  • 2006 Neb. LEXIS 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the division of property is not subject to a precise mathematical formula, the general rule is to award a spouse one-third to one-half of the marital estate, the polestar being fairness and reasonableness as determined by the facts of each case.”
  • “it is clear that [the appellant’s] acceptance of the benefits of the alimony award is not inconsistent with her appellate argument regarding the property division, and appellate disposition of that appellate argument could not affect the alimony award entered by the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Heavican

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.