Michigan Court of Appeals· 3/4/1980
Heilman v. Heilman
Citations
- 291 N.W.2d 183
- 95 Mich. App. 728
- 1980 Mich. App. LEXIS 2512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \a spouse's chose in action for personal injuries and the other spouse's per quod claim constitute property subject to such distribution\
- a trial court may properly take into consideration a parent’s ability to work and earn money in setting the appropriate child support award
- a trial court may properly take into consideration a parent's ability to work and earn money in setting the appropriate child support award
- “a spouse’s chose in action for personal injuries and the other spouse’s per quod claim constitute property subject to such distribution”
- “a spouse’s chose in action for personal injuries and the other spouse’s per quod claim constitute property subject to such distribution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacKenzie, Brennan, Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Golden v. GoldenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1996-08-16· cited 109×
- Mistler v. MistlerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-08-29· cited 83×
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-12-29· cited 66×
- Weisfeld v. WeisfeldSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-15· cited 60×
- Pierce v. PierceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-08-17· cited 40×
- Ghidotti v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court· 1998-12-28· cited 32×
- Hanify v. HanifyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-08-09· cited 29×
- Gramer v. GramerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1994-10-03· cited 27×
- McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-03-11· cited 26×
- Rohloff v. RohloffMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-07-21· cited 24×
- Tramel v. TramelMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-08-12· cited 23×
- Marsh v. MarshSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-09· cited 21×
- Boyce v. BoyceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-11· cited 20×
- Moulton v. MoultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-12-20· cited 18×
- Bunt v. BuntSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-02-16· cited 17×
- Dunn v. DunnMichigan Court of Appeals· 1981-04-23· cited 16×
- Wright v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court· 1995-10-13· cited 14×
- Fink v. FinkSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-10-01· cited 11×
- Colestock v. ColestockMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-06-18· cited 10×
- Bywater v. BywaterMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-08-31· cited 10×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1956-09-04· cited 86×
- Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-11-07· cited 59×
- Dunlap v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1883-04-25· cited 20×
- Travis v. TravisMichigan Court of Appeals· 1969-08-28· cited 18×
- McDermott v. McDermottMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-06-06· cited 12×
- Engemann v. EngemannMichigan Court of Appeals· 1974-05-31· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.