Skip to main content
· 3/14/1984

Van De Loo v. Van De Loo

Citations

  • 346 N.W.2d 173
  • 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The appellate courts need not * * * defer to the trial court in reviewing questions of law.\
  • “We are persuaded that the purpose of the recovery rather than the timing of the recovery controls its characterization.”
  • held money obtained for personal injuries is nonmarital property, but nevertheless affirmed an apportionment of the assets purchased with the proceeds, as the failure to divide the property would have constituted an unfair hardship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Foley, Sedgwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.