Kentucky Supreme Court· 4/24/1997

Bowling v. Commonwealth

Citations

942 S.W.2d 293
1997 Ky. LEXIS 57
1996 WL 554527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that officer may opine that defendant looked at them strangely or intensely
holding that officer may opine that defendant looked at them strangely or intensely
“the mere fact that a person has been the victim of a similar crime is insufficient to mandate a prospective juror be excused for cause.”
\the mere fact that a person has been the victim of a similar crime is insufficient to mandate a prospective juror be excused for cause.\
evidence of other crimes passed KRE 403 balancing test wherein the evidence rebutted a claimed defense and identification of the defendant as the assailant was at issue
evidence of other crimes passed KRE 403 balancing test ' wherein the evidence rebutted a claimed defense and identification of the defendant as the assailant was at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Graves, King, Lambert, Wintersheimer, Stephens, Stumbo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bowling v. Commonwealth

34 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.