Commonwealth v. Sawhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth exception for “any other evidence directly pertaining to the offense charged”
• \The clearly unreasonable test seems to be a higher standard for granting a directed verdict ... constitut[ing] an appellate standard of review.\
• standard of review is the same whether conviction is based on direct or circumstantial evidence
• standard of review is the same whether conviction is based on direct or circumstantial evidence
• \The clearly unreasonable test seems to be a higher standard for granting a directed verdict... constitut[ing] an appellate standard of review.\
• “We do not overlook the fact that flight and attempts at concealment are circumstantial evidence of guilt, because they suggest a guilty state of mind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).