· 3/18/2010
Hunt v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 304 S.W.3d 15
- 2009 WL 4117354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding harmless error where there was “no doubt” a qualifying relation would have been as emotional about the loss of the victim as the non-qualifying witness
- prosecutor’s statement “[h]as anybody seen any remorse from this defendant during the trial?” did not constitute an impermissible comment on defendant’s _Fifth Arriendment rights
- “The trial court’s decision not to give a jury instruction is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
- “[W]e are not persuaded that the single reference to Hunt’s invoking his right to remain silent resulted in palpable error.”
- “Because the prosecutorial conduct complained of by Hunt occurred in a pretrial setting, the presumption of vindictiveness doctrine is inapplicable.”
- \A prosecutor is entitled to comment on the courtroom demeanor of a defendant.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Venters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.