Skip to main content
· 3/18/2010

Hunt v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 304 S.W.3d 15
  • 2009 WL 4117354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding harmless error where there was “no doubt” a qualifying relation would have been as emotional about the loss of the victim as the non-qualifying witness
  • prosecutor’s statement “[h]as anybody seen any remorse from this defendant during the trial?” did not constitute an impermissible comment on defendant’s _Fifth Arriendment rights
  • “The trial court’s decision not to give a jury instruction is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
  • “[W]e are not persuaded that the single reference to Hunt’s invoking his right to remain silent resulted in palpable error.”
  • “Because the prosecutorial conduct complained of by Hunt occurred in a pretrial setting, the presumption of vindictiveness doctrine is inapplicable.”
  • \A prosecutor is entitled to comment on the courtroom demeanor of a defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.