Court of Appeals of Virginia· 12/27/2007
Bowling v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 654 S.E.2d 354
- 51 Va. App. 102
- 2007 Va. App. LEXIS 461
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that admissibility and sufficiency “are two completely separate legal questions, requiring two distinct legal analyses”
- holding that “whether evidence is admissible at trial and whether it is sufficient to prove the charges against an accused are two completely separate legal questions, requiring two distinct legal analyses”
- stating that this Court “reviews the totality of the evidence to determine whether it was sufficient to prove” the charged offense
- holding that, even though defendant made a motion to strike at the conclusion of the case, because the motion did not argue that the evidence was not sufficient to establish a specific element of the offense, this specific argument was not preserved for appeal
- holding defendant’s failure to challenge the sufficiency of evidence supporting a specific element of the offense at the motion to strike failed to preserve the issue on appeal
- holding defendant’s failure to challenge the sufficiency of evidence supporting a specific element of the offense at the motion to strike failed to preserve the issue on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William G. Petty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Andy Chavez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2018-08-14· cited 662×
- Flanagan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-08-30· cited 217×
- Ervin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-01-25· cited 147×
- Quyen Vinh Phan Le v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-07-28· cited 51×
- Jeffrey D. Wells v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2016-01-26· cited 32×
- Merritt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-03-02· cited 11×
- Morris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-10-18· cited 6×
- Goble v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-09-14· cited 6×
- Barson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-07-05· cited 5×
- Bakran v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-10-26· cited 3×
- Damon Phineas Jordan v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2012-08-28· cited 2×
- Scialdone v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-01-13· cited 2×
- Edwards Jones, s/k/a Edward S. Jones v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-01-13
- Barry R. Taylor v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-01-13
- Douglas Leon Miner v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2024-03-12
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-12-09· cited 625×
- Mounce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-07-07· cited 245×
- Turner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-12-02· cited 180×
- Ragland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-08-17· cited 133×
- Crawley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-03-23· cited 131×
- Commonwealth v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia· 2004-03-05· cited 99×
- Auer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-10-25· cited 79×
- Ainslie v. InmanSupreme Court of Virginia· 2003-02-28· cited 67×
- Cook v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2004-06-10· cited 63×
- M.G. v. Albemarle County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-07-22· cited 60×
- Hunter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-02-16· cited 57×
- Kitze v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-09-24· cited 44×
- Sabol v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-10-16· cited 40×
- Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1922-09-21· cited 38×
- Coles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-12-14· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.