Kentucky Supreme Court· 6/4/1992

Wilson v. Commonwealth

Citations

836 S.W.2d 872
1992 Ky. LEXIS 84
1992 WL 121711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The decision to sequester the jury resides within the discretion of the trial court from the outset of the proceedings.”
\The decision to sequester the jury resides within the discretion of the trial court from the outset of the proceedings.\
\The decision to sequester the jury resides within the discretion of the trial court from the onset of the proceedings.\ Id.
\The exclusion of one person from the remainder of cross-examination of the last witness in the guilt phase of a trial can hardly be characterized as a denial of a public trial.\
“The exclusion of one person from the remainder of cross-examination of the last witness in the guilt phase of a trial can hardly be characterized as a denial of a public trial.”
overruled on other grounds, St. Clair v. Roark, Ky., 10 S.W.3d 482 (1999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens, Lambert, Reynolds, Spain, Wintersheimer, Leibson, Combs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.