Skip to main content
· 6/4/1999

Bowden, Roy E. v. United States

Citations

  • 176 F.3d 552
  • 336 U.S. App. D.C. 126
  • 44 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 591
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11361
  • 1999 WL 354497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Though erroneous, the district court’s denial of Bowden’s motion to amend does not require a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.