· 6/4/1999
Bowden, Roy E. v. United States
Citations
- 176 F.3d 552
- 336 U.S. App. D.C. 126
- 44 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 591
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11361
- 1999 WL 354497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Though erroneous, the district court’s denial of Bowden’s motion to amend does not require a new trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randolph, Rogers, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.