· 10/29/1999
Samii, Kuross v. Billington, James H.
Citations
- 195 F.3d 1
- 338 U.S. App. D.C. 386
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 27981
- 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,026
- 1999 WL 979249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Since the ultimate burden of persuasion in proving retaliation remains with the plaintiff, summary judgment is appropriate when the employee is unable to satisfy this burden.”
- “Since the ultimate burden of persuasion in proving retaliation remains with the plaintiff, summary judgment is appropriate when the employee is unable to satisfy this burden.”
- “A person’s actions, not the official designation of his role, 3 determines whether he enjoys fiduciary status, regardless of what his agreed-upon 4 contractual responsibilities may be.”
- same, for other types of adverse personnel actions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Randolph, Buckley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.