Skip to main content
· 10/29/1999

Samii, Kuross v. Billington, James H.

Citations

  • 195 F.3d 1
  • 338 U.S. App. D.C. 386
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 27981
  • 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,026
  • 1999 WL 979249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since the ultimate burden of persuasion in proving retaliation remains with the plaintiff, summary judgment is appropriate when the employee is unable to satisfy this burden.”
  • “Since the ultimate burden of persuasion in proving retaliation remains with the plaintiff, summary judgment is appropriate when the employee is unable to satisfy this burden.”
  • “A person’s actions, not the official designation of his role, 3 determines whether he enjoys fiduciary status, regardless of what his agreed-upon 4 contractual responsibilities may be.”
  • same, for other types of adverse personnel actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Randolph, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.