Albright v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “emotional trauma alone is sufficient to qualify as an ‘adverse effect’ ”
• stating that \emotional trauma alone is sufficient to qualify as an `adverse effect'\
• holding a plaintiff recovered damages under the Act by producing actual evidence to show she suffered emotional trauma caused by the agency’s violation of the Act
• noting that an agency acts intentionally or willfully “either by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or by flagrantly disregarding others’ rights under the Act”
• stating that \emotional trauma alone is sufficient to qualify as an `adverse effect'\
• considering agency's actions prior to and after decision to videotape meeting, including subsequent offer to destroy videotape at issue, in finding actions not intentional or willful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Albright v. United States

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Albright v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1949-03-10· cited 70×
• Albright v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1963-04-05· cited 46×
• Albright v. United States
  District of Columbia· 1982-12-01· cited 6×
• Albright v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1992-09-11· cited 2×
• Albright v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1964-11-09· cited 2×
• Albright v. United States
  D. Minnesota· 1948-03-18· cited 1×
• Albright v. United States
  S.D. Alabama· 1961-06-08· cited 1×
• Albright v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-08-06
• Albright v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2017-05-15
• Albright v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-09