D.C. Circuit· 4/10/1984

Albright v. United States

Citations

235 U.S. App. D.C. 295
732 F.2d 181
1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “emotional trauma alone is sufficient to qualify as an ‘adverse effect’ ”
stating that \emotional trauma alone is sufficient to qualify as an `adverse effect'\
holding a plaintiff recovered damages under the Act by producing actual evidence to show she suffered emotional trauma caused by the agency’s violation of the Act
noting that an agency acts intentionally or willfully “either by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or by flagrantly disregarding others’ rights under the Act”
stating that \emotional trauma alone is sufficient to qualify as an `adverse effect'\
considering agency's actions prior to and after decision to videotape meeting, including subsequent offer to destroy videotape at issue, in finding actions not intentional or willful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Wilkey, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Albright v. United States

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.