Skip to main content
· 1/12/2010

Pietsch v. McKISSACK & McKISSACK

Citations

  • 677 F. Supp. 2d 325
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43799
  • 2010 WL 94562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint and denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss
  • “An amended complaint is futile if it merely restates the same facts as the original complaint in different terms, reasserts a claim on which the court previously ruled, fails to state a legal theory or could not withstand a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.