District of Columbia· 1/12/2010
Pietsch v. McKISSACK & McKISSACK
Citations
- 677 F. Supp. 2d 325
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43799
- 2010 WL 94562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint and denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss
- “An amended complaint is futile if it merely restates the same facts as the original complaint in different terms, reasserts a claim on which the court previously ruled, fails to state a legal theory or could not withstand a motion to dismiss.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jones v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2015-07-01· cited 16×
- Jia Di Feng v. See-Lee LimDistrict of Columbia· 2011-05-12· cited 13×
- Tereshchuk v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-31· cited 11×
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2013-11-21· cited 8×
- Saint-Jean v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2012-02-21· cited 8×
- Yelverton v. FoxDistrict of Columbia· 2013-11-01· cited 3×
- Saint-Jean v. District of Columbia Public Schools Division of TransportationDistrict of Columbia· 2012-02-21
- Feng v. LimDistrict of Columbia· 2011-05-12
- Mill v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for First Nbc BankDistrict of Columbia· 2019-07-31
- Webb v. United States Veterans InitiativeDistrict of Columbia· 2021-10-29
- Preferra Insurance Company Risk Retention Group v. National Association of Social Workers, Inc.District of Columbia· 2025-03-25
- Diamond a Ranch, Western Division, L.L.C. v. WolfDistrict of Columbia· 2025-09-29
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorD.C. Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 985×
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyD.C. Circuit· 1996-07-03· cited 777×
- Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLCD.C. Circuit· 1998-07-17· cited 401×
- Willoughby v. Potomac Electric Power Co.D.C. Circuit· 1996-11-26· cited 127×
- Robinson v. Detroit News, Inc.District of Columbia· 2002-06-27· cited 114×
- James v. Hurson Associates, Inc. v. GlickmanD.C. Circuit· 2000-10-24· cited 95×
- Khan v. Parsons Global Services, Ltd.D.C. Circuit· 2008-04-11· cited 92×
- Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-24· cited 89×
- Phelan v. City of Mount RainierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-08-22· cited 77×
- Cramer v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-12-12· cited 62×
- United States Information Agency v. Jan KrcD.C. Circuit· 1990-06-05· cited 55×
- Wiggins v. District Cablevision, Inc.District of Columbia· 1994-05-13· cited 48×
- Alexander v. Washington Gas Light Co.District of Columbia· 2006-02-23· cited 38×
- Bowden, Roy E. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1999-06-04· cited 37×
- Bancoult v. McNamaraDistrict of Columbia· 2003-03-10· cited 30×
- Penhollow v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS CECIL COUNTYCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-30· cited 25×
Other cases named Pietsch v. McKISSACK & McKISSACK
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.