· 9/14/2004
Rochester Holmes v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General
Citations
- 384 F.3d 356
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19256
- 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,832
- 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 737
- 2004 WL 2039169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- [P]retext . . . may be proved by showing . . . that the stated reason is insufficient to warrant the adverse action.”
- “[W]e do not sit as a superpersonnel department that reexamines an entity’s business decision and reviews the propriety of that decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Bauer, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.