Skip to main content
· 9/14/2004

Rochester Holmes v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General

Citations

  • 384 F.3d 356
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19256
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,832
  • 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 737
  • 2004 WL 2039169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • [P]retext . . . may be proved by showing . . . that the stated reason is insufficient to warrant the adverse action.”
  • “[W]e do not sit as a superpersonnel department that reexamines an entity’s business decision and reviews the propriety of that decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Bauer, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.