Skip to main content
· 6/20/1994

Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 876 P.2d 1242
  • 18 Brief Times Rptr. 1102
  • 1994 Colo. LEXIS 515
  • 1994 WL 270040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party may not benefit from its own failure to designate pertinent portions of the record
  • holding that 12 district court correctly permitted cross-examination of expert regarding civil suit challenging reliability of procedures at issue
  • evidence of prior lawsuit against expert witness alleging inadequate testing methods admissible as relevant to witness' credibility and accuracy of his testimony
  • “An appellate court must presume that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are supported by the evidence when the appellant has failed to provide a complete record.”
  • \An appellate court must presume that the trial court's findings and conclusions are supported by the evidence when the appellant has failed to provide a complete record.\
  • “An appellate court must presume that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are supported by the evidence when the appellant has failed to provide a complete record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vollack, Rovira

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.