Kelley v. Wiggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding there was no abuse of discretion in the admission of evidence of common insurance following a determination that the probative value outweighed the danger of prejudice
• no abuse of discretion in admission of evidence of common insurance following determination that probative value outweighed danger of prejudice
• evidence of common insurer appropriate during trial “already permeated with the presence of two insurer defendants”
• trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing plaintiff to cross-examine defense expert as to whether he was insured and whether his premium rates would increase if a verdict was returned against the defendant-physician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).