Hawes v. Chua

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commonality of insurance company insufficient in absence of proffer of substantial connection such as showing that expert is agent of insurer
• under substantial connection test, trial court did not abuse discretion in excluding evidence that defendant physicians and defendants’ expert witness all were insured by same company
• “the standard of care focuses on the course of action that a reasonably prudent doctor with the defendant’s specialty would have taken under the same or similar circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).