· 6/28/1993
Bonner v. Chicago Transit Authority
Citations
- 618 N.E.2d 871
- 249 Ill. App. 3d 210
- 188 Ill. Dec. 301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Transit Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Transit Act is measured by a stricter standard
- a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Act is measured by a stricter standard
- a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Act is measured by a stricter standard
- section 41 applied to plaintiff whose vehicle collided with a CTA bus
- a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Transit Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Transit Act is measured by a stricter standard
- plaintiff omitted approximate hour of the accident and listed incorrect date
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.