Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/28/1993

Bonner v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

618 N.E.2d 871
249 Ill. App. 3d 210
188 Ill. Dec. 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Transit Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Transit Act is measured by a stricter standard
a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Act is measured by a stricter standard
a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Act is measured by a stricter standard
section 41 applied to plaintiff whose vehicle collided with a CTA bus
a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Transit Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Transit Act is measured by a stricter standard
plaintiff omitted approximate hour of the accident and listed incorrect date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.