Skip to main content
· 6/28/1993

Bonner v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

  • 618 N.E.2d 871
  • 249 Ill. App. 3d 210
  • 188 Ill. Dec. 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Transit Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Transit Act is measured by a stricter standard
  • a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Act is measured by a stricter standard
  • a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Act is measured by a stricter standard
  • section 41 applied to plaintiff whose vehicle collided with a CTA bus
  • a plaintiff must rely on cases that construe section 41 of the Transit Act, rather than the Tort Immunity Act, because notice under the Transit Act is measured by a stricter standard
  • plaintiff omitted approximate hour of the accident and listed incorrect date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.