Murphy v. Chicago Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \section 41 puts the burden upon the claimant to ascertain her rights and to comply with the statutory prerequisites for maintaining a lawsuit against the CTA\
• “section 41 puts the burden upon the claimant to ascertain her rights and to comply with the statutory prerequisites for maintaining a lawsuit against the CTA”
• court held that plaintiffs counsel could not rely on vague assertions by the claims representative that “everything was okay” and would be taken care of, but was required to take steps to ensure that his client’s interests were safeguarded
• court held that plaintiff's counsel could not rely on vague assertions by the claims representative that \everything was okay\ and would be taken care of, but was required to take steps to ensure that his client's interests were safeguarded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Joseph v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-08-03· cited 50×
• Niziolek v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-12· cited 22×
• Bonner v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-28· cited 20×
• Sanders v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-30· cited 19×
• Streeter v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-05-23· cited 15×
• Pothier v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-23· cited 13×
• Cione v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-04-25· cited 10×
• Patinkin v. Regional Transportation Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-06-03· cited 10×
• Curtis v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-23· cited 8×
• Segarra v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-23· cited 5×
• Buczak v. Central Savings & Loan Ass'n
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-26· cited 5×
• Barrera v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-14· cited 3×
• Williams v. City of Chicago
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-11-29· cited 3×
• Johnson v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-07-25· cited 1×
• Joseph v. CTA
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-08-03
• Cione v. Chicago Transit Authority Nunc Pro Tunc to Mar. 30, 2001
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-04-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Saragusa v. City of Chicago
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-05-14· cited 59×
• Housewright v. City of LaHarpe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-03-30· cited 57×
• Dunbar v. Reiser
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 36×
• Searcy v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-08-18· cited 20×
• Shortt v. City of Chicago
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-09-02· cited 11×