Skip to main content
· 8/16/1999

Yokley v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

  • 717 N.E.2d 451
  • 307 Ill. App. 3d 132
  • 240 Ill. Dec. 358
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the location of the accident is an essential element of a section 41 notice because it allows the CTA to determine which train and operator were involved in the alleged accident, to locate witnesses, and to examine the accident scene
  • noting that the location of the accident is an essential element of a section 41 notice because it allows the CTA to determine which train and operator were involved in the alleged accident, to locate witnesses, and to examine the accident scene
  • “[providing a nonexistent location is tantamount to providing no location at all”
  • \[p]roviding a nonexistent location is tantamount to providing no location at all\
  • the notice of claim is insufficient if it requires the CTA to speculate as to the location of the accident
  • the notice of claim is insufficient if it requires the CTA to speculate as to the location of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.