Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/30/1999

Dimeo v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

724 N.E.2d 92
311 Ill. App. 3d 152
243 Ill. Dec. 783
1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“ ‘Notices missing even a single element are defective, as well as notices containing an incorrect element ***’ ”
case dismissed for failing to include the time of the accident despite plaintiff's argument to disregard the \minimal\ defect in her notice in order to ensure a just result
dismissal required where “time” element omitted despite plaintiffs claim that the “defect in her notice is so minimal that it should be disregarded in order to ensure a just result”
case dismissed for failing to include the time of the accident despite plaintiffs argument to disregard the “minimal” defect in her notice in order to ensure a just result
dismissal required where \time\ element omitted despite plain-tiff's claim that the \defect in her notice is so minimal that it should be disregarded in order to ensure a just result\
the CTA's actual knowledge or ability to obtain information missing from a section 41 notice is irrelevant to the validity of the notice, as it is \solely the plaintiffs burden to comply with the section 41 notice requirements\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: South

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.