Skip to main content
N.D. California· 7/22/1994

Bloom v. Martin

Citations

  • 865 F. Supp. 1377
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 14454
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13726
  • 1994 WL 532101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Congress did not intend to create a private right of action for violations of Section 2603
  • finding no private cause of action under 12 U.S.C. § 2603

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.