Christine Stowell, Etc. v. H. Rollin Ives, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “section 1396a(c)(l) provides incentives — not commands — to the States”
• recognizing it is “both prudent and possible to synthesize the teachings of Suter with the Court’s prior precedents”
• “[W]e think it is much too early to post epitaphs for Wilder and its kin.”
• “States are not obliged by federal law to sponsor medical assistance plans or to accept federal funds for this purpose.”
• \There is a presumption against implied rights of action a presumption that will endure unless the plaintiff proffers adequate evidence of a contrary congressional intent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).