S.D. New York· 5/16/1995
Bio-Technology General Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.
Citations
- 886 F. Supp. 377
- 36 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1169
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6533
- 1995 WL 307195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- to demonstrate sham lawsuit in antitrust context, defendant must show that lawsuit is objectively baseless and not legally viable and is merely an attempt to interfere with defendant’s business relationships
- “Plaintiff argues that . . . its loss of the ability to enter into third party contracts is sufficient to fulfill this requirement [of showing an interference with property]. However, the clear weight of case law is to the contrary.”
- “Plaintiff argues that its $2 million in attorney's fees and its loss of the ability to enter into third party contracts is sufficient to fulfill this requirement [of showing an interference with property]. However, the clear weight of case law is to the contrary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Motley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wolff v. Rare Medium, Inc.S.D. New York· 2002-07-23· cited 45×
- Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. UngerS.D. New York· 1998-07-13· cited 39×
- In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.S.D. Illinois· 2019-04-03· cited 31×
- Cytyc Corp. v. Neuromedical Systems, Inc.S.D. New York· 1998-06-15· cited 25×
- Estwick v. U.S.Air ShuttleE.D. New York· 1996-12-09· cited 23×
- Nichols v. MahoneyS.D. New York· 2009-04-02· cited 18×
- Moore U.S.A. Inc. v. Standard Register Co.W.D. New York· 2001-02-22· cited 16×
- Twin City Bakery Workers & Welfare Fund v. Astra AktiebolagS.D. New York· 2002-06-21· cited 9×
- Eavzan v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corp.S.D. New York· 1998-11-19· cited 6×
- Bedford Affiliates v. ManheimerE.D. New York· 1999-03-24· cited 4×
- Smith v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 1996-12-09· cited 3×
- Bio-Technology General Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2001-09-27· cited 3×
- Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl Corp.D. New Jersey· 1998-02-05· cited 2×
- Eastern Effects, Inc. v. 3911 Lemmon Ave. Assoc., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2026-06-02
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 1,996×
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,808×
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-05-03· cited 953×
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Second Circuit· 1993-12-17· cited 848×
- Goldman v. BeldenSecond Circuit· 1985-02-12· cited 788×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaSecond Circuit· 1972-08-03· cited 409×
- Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 1992-03-30· cited 255×
- Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals· 1969-01-23· cited 229×
- American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, and Universal City Studios, Inc., Intervening-Defendant-AppellantSecond Circuit· 1979-11-09· cited 182×
- Susan R. Frasier v. General Electric CompanySecond Circuit· 1991-04-12· cited 154×
- Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.Second Circuit· 1991-11-08· cited 130×
- Aunyx Corp. v. Canon U. S. A., Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-03-08· cited 123×
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1984-09-26· cited 122×
- Mitchell v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1980-01-07· cited 122×
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1979-07-27· cited 121×
- Aunyx Corporation v. Canon U.S.A., IncorporatedFirst Circuit· 1992-10-21· cited 105×
- In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent LitigationFederal Circuit· 1990-05-14· cited 103×
- National Ass'n of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, Inc. v. Ayerst LaboratoriesSecond Circuit· 1988-06-22· cited 93×
Other cases named Bio-Technology General Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.