Skip to main content
· 4/12/1991

Susan R. Frasier v. General Electric Company

Citations

  • 930 F.2d 1004
  • 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 409
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 6019
  • 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,861
  • 1991 WL 55228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a district court should not dismiss an action without granting leave to amend at least once when the complaint gives “any indication that a valid claim” may be stated
  • noting that upon amending her complaint on remand, the plaintiff would be required to “in good faith allege that [the defendant’s] conduct was willful . . . to assert a viable claim with respect to conduct that occurred prior to” the two-year limitations period
  • allegation that plaintiff was not receiving equal pay for equal work too vague to withstand motion to dismiss
  • allegation that plaintiff “was not receiving equal pay for equal work” held “too conelusory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Kearse, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.