Skip to main content
· 12/9/1996

Estwick v. U.S.Air Shuttle

Citations

  • 950 F. Supp. 493
  • 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1315
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20104
  • 1996 WL 729379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that after plaintiff’s death, “[t]he punitive damages are plainly penal and must be dismissed under either federal or state law”
  • holding that defect in plaintiff’s standing without appointment as administratrix was cured by plaintiff’s subsequent appointment thereof and reasoning that ruling otherwise would be “contrary to the liberal policy underlying [Rule 17(a)]”
  • finding that plaintiff had “cured” her “standing deficiency” after her “subsequent appointment as administratrix”
  • dismissing claims for punitive damages under Title VII, ADEA, and ADA, but permitting the compensatory damages claims to continue
  • rejecting argument that plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed because plaintiff was not named as an administratrix of her husband’s estate at the time the complaint was filed, finding such a result would be “contrary to the liberal policy underlying [Rule 17(a)]”
  • “The punitive damages are plainly penal and must be dismissed under either federal or state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.