· 12/9/1996
Estwick v. U.S.Air Shuttle
Citations
- 950 F. Supp. 493
- 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1315
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20104
- 1996 WL 729379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that after plaintiff’s death, “[t]he punitive damages are plainly penal and must be dismissed under either federal or state law”
- holding that defect in plaintiff’s standing without appointment as administratrix was cured by plaintiff’s subsequent appointment thereof and reasoning that ruling otherwise would be “contrary to the liberal policy underlying [Rule 17(a)]”
- finding that plaintiff had “cured” her “standing deficiency” after her “subsequent appointment as administratrix”
- dismissing claims for punitive damages under Title VII, ADEA, and ADA, but permitting the compensatory damages claims to continue
- rejecting argument that plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed because plaintiff was not named as an administratrix of her husband’s estate at the time the complaint was filed, finding such a result would be “contrary to the liberal policy underlying [Rule 17(a)]”
- “The punitive damages are plainly penal and must be dismissed under either federal or state law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sifton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.