Bertalan v. Bertalan
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1443
Syllabus
Divorce; abuse of discretion; division of property; retirement assets; distributive award; financial misconduct; attorney fees; trial continuance; show cause motion; motion to compel discovery; spousal support; child support; withdrawal of counsel; motion for new trial; pro se; affidavit; Civ.R. 60(A); App.R. 9(A)(1); App.R. 12(A); R.C. 2319.02; R.C. 2701.03; R.C. 3105.171; R.C. 3105.73; Prof.Cond.R. 1.16(b); affidavit of disqualification; judicial bias; due process; discovery; restraining order. The court affirmed the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, Division of Domestic Relations' decree of divorce and denial of appellant-husband's motion for new trial, overruling husband's six assignments of error. Husband argued that the trial court erred in denying his motions for trial continuances, first a motion to continue filed when his attorney withdrew and a second motion filed during the trial itself, when husband claimed he recently suffered a head injury and also needed to care for his ailing mother. Husband also alleged judicial bias and misconduct, pointing to his filing of affidavits of disqualification. Finally, husband argued that the trial court's final divorce decree resulted in an inequitable division of marital assets, including retirement funds, and unfairly burdened him with the appellee-wife's attorney fees. The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in denying the motions for continuances considering the length of the case, the inconvenience to wife, and husband's contribution to the delays. Regarding the allegations of judicial bias, appellate courts lack the authority to rule on such claims, as they fall under the purview of the Ohio Supreme Court's Chief Justice, and husband's arguments did not implicate due-process concerns. The ultimate division of marital assets and the award of attorney fees were within the trial court's discretion, particularly given the husband's financial misconduct and failure to comply with court orders, which justi
Judges: Calabrese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Manning v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-16· cited 4×
- E.A. v. A.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-02· cited 2×
- In re K.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-04· cited 1×
- Allan v. Tallan, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-04
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-02
- Patrick v. PatrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-12
- Bradley v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-02
- Islam v. RazzakOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-16
- In re M.W.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-30
- Bertalan v. BertalanOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-14
- Robinson v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-04
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Booth v. BoothOhio Supreme Court· 1989-07-26· cited 1,162×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- Berish v. BerishOhio Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 459×
- Hoyt v. HoytOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 287×
- Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-28· cited 286×
- Rand v. RandOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 219×
- State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 80×
- Strauss v. StraussOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-04· cited 65×
- Gentile v. GentileOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-04· cited 27×
- Musto v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-13· cited 23×
- Saks v. RigaOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-06· cited 22×
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2017-10-12· cited 19×
- Trolli v. TrolliOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-29· cited 18×
- Hunter v. TroutmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-06· cited 15×
- In re Order Requiring Fingerprinting of a JuvenileOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-03· cited 14×
- In re Q.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-09· cited 13×
- Bradley v. BradleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-22· cited 11×
- La Spisa v. La SpisaOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-28· cited 11×
- State v. MunozOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-08· cited 10×
Other cases named Bertalan v. Bertalan
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.