In re K.C.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5414
Syllabus
File a transcript; presume the regularity of the proceedings; identification of error in the record; App.R. 4(A)(1); App.R. 9(B)(1); App.R. 16(A)(7). Affirmed. Father's appeals of the juvenile court's April 10 and May 23, 2025 entries are overruled because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days of the date of the entry as required by App.R. 4(A)(1). The juvenile court's March 26 and March 27, 2025 entries are affirmed because Father failed to file a transcript. Without a record, the appellate court presumes the regularity of the proceedings in the trial court. In addition, Father did not identify the error in the record and did not provide supportive legal arguments.
Judges: Calabrese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- Strauss v. StraussOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-04· cited 65×
- In re Q.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-09· cited 13×
- Bertalan v. BertalanOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-24· cited 11×
- Huntington Natl. Bank v. BlueOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.