Skip to main content

Berry v. Loiseau

Citations

  • 223 Conn. 786
  • 614 A.2d 414
  • 1992 Conn. LEXIS 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that court was not bound by contingency-fee agreement in calculating punitive damages under state statute
  • noting that a contingency fee agreement does not limit a court’s diseretion in fashioning a punitive damages award
  • holding that trial court erred in directing verdict for defendants on false imprisonment claim where evidence showed that defendants took plaintiff by arm, escorted him to defendants’ office and car, used abusive and threatening language toward plaintiff, and displayed revolver
  • noting that “[l]itigation expenses may include . . . [inter alia] attorney’s fees”
  • explaining that, “[i]n order to award punitive or exemplary damages, evidence must reveal a reckless indifference to the rights of others or an intentional and wanton violation of those rights”
  • confirming the “well established rule” that common law punitive damages are limited to litigation costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Glass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.