Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/26/1996

Hunt v. Prior

Citations

236 Conn. 421
673 A.2d 514
1996 Conn. LEXIS 82
151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a suspension with pay did not carry constitutional ramifications because plaintiff did not prove that he was entitled to anything but his salary
holding that a suspension with pay did not carry constó tutional ramifications because plaintiff did not prove that he was entitled to anything but his salary
holding \[failure to exhaust grievance and arbitration procedures deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction\
“[failure to exhaust the grievance procedures deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction” [internal quotation marks omitted]
“[fjailure to exhaust the grievance procedures deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction” [internal quotation marks omitted]
“One of the limited exceptions to the exhaustion rule arises when recourse to the administrative remedy would be demonstrably futile or inadequate.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Palmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.