Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when the defendant had “terminated any allegedly fraudulent scheme” prior to suit, there was no open-ended continuity
• explaining that “[f]ailure to present sufficient evidence on any one element of a RICO claim means the entire claim fails”
• noting that the Eighth Circuit has rejected “attempts to convert ordinary civil disputes into RICO cases”
• explaining that when a party asserts alternative theories of recovery for the same injury, the party is entitled only to a single award of compensatory damages
• explaining that when a party asserts alternative theories of recovery for the same injury, the party is entitled only to a single award of compensatory damages
• stating that a jury verdict is entitled to extreme deference and will not be set aside unless no reasonable jury could have reached the same verdict based on the evidence submitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).