Skip to main content

Petyan v. Ellis

Citations

  • 200 Conn. 243
  • 510 A.2d 1337
  • 1 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 665
  • 1986 Conn. LEXIS 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that former employer could not be sued for libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on statements made in form request by state agency
  • Holding that allegations that the plaintiff was released from his employment \for reasons of unsatisfactory performance and mainly for fraud and lying\ are insufficient to show \extreme and outrageous\ conduct.
  • noting that police officers sued for false arrests or “complaining witnesses” who initiate prosecutions are entitled only to qualified immunity
  • noting that “outrageous” conduct is that which exceeds “all bounds” usually tolerated by decent society
  • acknowledging that intentional infliction of emotional distress had been recognized in Connecticut since Hiers , and stating that Murray \provides appropriate guidelines for determining whether a successful cause of action will lie\
  • approving formulation of tort in Murray v. Bridgeport Hosp., 40 Conn. Sup. 56, 62, 480 A.2d 610 (1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan, Dannehy, Santaniello, Whom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

227 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.