Batick v. Seymour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court has duty to submit to jury no issue on which evidence would not reasonably support finding
• suggesting that standard for admitting evidence that is challenged as prejudicial should be lower in civil case than in criminal case
• “[t]he court has a duty to submit to the jury no issue upon which the evidence would not reasonably support a finding”
• summary judgment is particularly inappropriate where the inferences which the parties seek to have drawn deal with questions of motive, intent and subjective feelings and reactions
• summary judgment inappropriate when questions deal with subjective feelings and reactions
• questions of motive and intent are questions of fact for jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).