· 3/10/1992
Bernatowicz v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Citations
- 785 F. Supp. 488
- 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 489
- 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1250
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2889
- 1992 WL 45738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although plaintiffs asserted that they were not challenging defendant’s determinations regarding their eligibility for benefits, claims for negligent misrepresentation were preempted, since lost benefits were clearly a component of the recovery plaintiffs sought
- declining to follow Green blatt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.