Skip to main content
· 3/10/1992

Bernatowicz v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

Citations

  • 785 F. Supp. 488
  • 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 489
  • 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1250
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2889
  • 1992 WL 45738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although plaintiffs asserted that they were not challenging defendant’s determinations regarding their eligibility for benefits, claims for negligent misrepresentation were preempted, since lost benefits were clearly a component of the recovery plaintiffs sought
  • declining to follow Green blatt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.