· 9/30/1992
Elsesser v. Hospital of the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine
Citations
- 802 F. Supp. 1286
- 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1063
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16046
- 1992 WL 252864
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the cause of action based on allegations that HMO withheld benefits were preempted, while the claims against HMO for its negligent selection, retention, and evaluation of a primary-care physician were not preempted
- plaintiffs’ claim alleging vicarious liability of HMO for actions of physician acting ostensibly as HMO’s agent not preempted
- state law claims of vicarious liability against HMO not preempted
- malpractice claim for failure to provide funding for medical device
- discussing paragraph ii of plaintiff’s complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weiner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.