Skip to main content
· 9/30/1992

Elsesser v. Hospital of the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine

Citations

  • 802 F. Supp. 1286
  • 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1063
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16046
  • 1992 WL 252864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the cause of action based on allegations that HMO withheld benefits were preempted, while the claims against HMO for its negligent selection, retention, and evaluation of a primary-care physician were not preempted
  • plaintiffs’ claim alleging vicarious liability of HMO for actions of physician acting ostensibly as HMO’s agent not preempted
  • state law claims of vicarious liability against HMO not preempted
  • malpractice claim for failure to provide funding for medical device
  • discussing paragraph ii of plaintiff’s complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weiner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.