Reilly v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining since plaintiff’s tort claims were dismissed, there was no underlying tort on which a per quod claim could rest
• because the plaintiff’s “tort claims [were] dismissed, there [was] no underlying tort on which the [per quod] loss of consortium claim can rest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).