Third Circuit· 10/26/2004
Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'n
Citations
- 387 F.3d 298
- 2004 WL 2382076
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Congress intended to submit pre-hire disputes to the RLA resolution mechanisms
- suggesting that Garmon was “extended” to the RLA in Jacksonville Terminal
- applying Garmon and Jacksonville Terminal to RLA major dispute and affirming dismissal of, inter alia, tortious and malicious interference, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of contract claims
- suggesting that Garmon was “extended” to the RLA in Jacksonville Terminal
- applying Garmon and Jacksonville Terminal to RLA major dispute and affirming dismissal of, inter alia, tortious and malicious interference, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of contract claims
- “[A]mendments that restate the original claim with greater particularity or amplify the factual circumstances surrounding the pertinent conduct, transaction or occurrence in the preceding pleading fall within Rule 15(c).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rendell, Fisher, Van Antwerpen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'n
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nD. New Jersey· 2009-12-17· cited 6×
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nD. New Jersey· 2003-07-18· cited 5×
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nD. New Jersey· 2009-12-17· cited 3×
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Assn.Supreme Court· 2005-05-02
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nSupreme Court· 2005-05-02
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nSupreme Court· 2005-05-02
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.