Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding delay alone insufficient to justify denial of leave to amend, particularly if plaintiff has offered justification for delay such as not knowing identity of proper defendant
• “Among the factors that may justify denial of leave to amend are undue delay, bad faith, and futility.”
• “Among the factors that may justify denial of leave to amend are undue delay, bad faith, and futility.”
• “The liberality of Rule 15(a) counsels in favor of amendment even when a party has been less than perfect in the preparation and presentation of a case.”
• “The liberality of Rule 15(a) counsels in favor of amendment even when a party has been less than perfect in the preparation and presentation of a case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).