Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retirees are not “employees” covered by the collective-bargaining provisions of the National Labor Relations Act
• holding that because retirees are no longer members of the bargaining unit, the union has no duty to represent them in negotiations with the employer
• concluding that the future retirement benefits of active workers were subject to mandatory bargaining because those benefits were part of their overall compensation
• concluding that the future retirement benefits of active workers were subject to mandatory bargaining because those benefits were part of their overall compensation
• holding that union owes no fair duty of representation to former workers who are retirees
• holding that \remedy for a unilateral mid-term modification to a permissive term lies in an action for breach of contract\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).